Supreme Court Sides With Trump

The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a lower court order that directed the Trump administration to release nearly

 

$2 billion in foreign aid payments by midnight on Wednesday.

The dispute revolves around the administration’s retention of U.S. Agency for International Development funds.

According to an emergency filing by the Justice Department, the administration requires additional time to evaluate outstanding payments for fraud and abuse. The department cautioned that adhering to the expedited timeline could result in irreparable financial damage, the Washington Examiner reported.

The Supreme Court instructed the parties to submit additional responses to their chambers by Friday, without providing any commentary on the case’s merits, as per a concise order issued by Chief Justice John Roberts.

“The order does not limit its abrupt deadline to respondents’ own invoices or letters of credit, instead apparently compelling the government to pay requests from any organization that has asked for such funds,” acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris wrote.

The fight started when aid groups and contractors sued Trump over his order to stop sending money to other countries for 90 days so that the order could be looked over.

U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, who was appointed by President Donald Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden, had already said that the freeze was illegal and had given the government until February to lift it. The plaintiffs say they still haven’t been paid, though.

Ali made a new order on Tuesday giving the administration until Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. to release the funds. He criticized officials for not following his first order. Indraneel Sur, a lawyer for the government, couldn’t say what steps were taken to process the payments during a hearing.

In Ali’s most recent decision, he told the government three times to release foreign aid funds that had been frozen after Trump told all foreign aid to stop for 90 days.

Trump asked for more time, but the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia wouldn’t extend

B

Related Posts

He Returned From Battle Without His Legs — What Joey Jones Reveals About Strength Could Inspire You

Redefining Strength After W*r Marine veteran Johnny “Joey” Jones once measured strength in muscle, grit, and pain tolerance. That changed in Iraq when a roadside b*mb took…

BREAKING: Secret Service Rushes T

Security Concerns Escalate at Mar-a-Lago A serious security breach occurred outside Mar-a-Lago when a 49-year-old woman approached the property claiming she had weapons in her car and…

If you have these two holes in your back, it mean

Those two small dimples on the lower back, just above the buttocks, are commonly known as Venus dimples (or dimples of Venus) in women and Apollo dimples in men. Medically, they are…

3 Colors You Should Never Wear

Funerals are moments of deep reflection and respect, and what you wear plays a role in showing empathy for the grieving. Clothing should be subdued, appropriate, and…

The unknown woman accompanying Trump at the Alaska meeting sparks interest — and leaves Putin smiling

There was a surprise star at Friday’s high-stakes summit and it wasn’t Trump or Putin. It was Monica Crowley, the poised, camera-ready Chief of Protocol who managed to charm the…

‘Zom bie Squirrels’ with oozing flesh terrify

Alarming Sightings of “Zombie Squirrels” Across the U.S. Americans are being warned to steer clear of squirrels after disturbing images surfaced of the animals with wart-like growths,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *