The Resilience of Democratic Institutions: Navigating Political Tensions in Modern America

Contemporary American political discourse has increasingly focused on fundamental questions about the health and durability of democratic institutions. These discussions reflect deeper concerns about how democratic systems adapt to changing political environments while maintaining their core principles and effectiveness.

Understanding Democratic Frameworks

Democratic governance relies on a complex web of institutions, norms, and practices that have evolved over centuries. The American system combines formal constitutional structures with informal traditions that together create the framework for representative government. Understanding how these elements interact provides insight into both the strengths and vulnerabilities of democratic systems.

 

The separation of powers among executive, legislative, and judicial branches represents one of the foundational elements of American democracy. This system was designed to prevent the concentration of authority in any single institution while ensuring that government remains accountable to the people. The effectiveness of these checks and balances depends not only on constitutional provisions but also on the willingness of political actors to respect institutional boundaries.

Federalism adds another layer of complexity to American democratic governance, distributing authority between national and state governments. This division of power creates multiple venues for political participation and policy experimentation while also creating potential tensions between different levels of government. The balance between federal and state authority has been a source of ongoing political debate throughout American history.

Electoral systems form the foundation of democratic legitimacy, providing mechanisms for peaceful transfers of power and popular input into government decisions. The integrity of these systems depends on public confidence in their fairness and accuracy, which can be influenced by factors including voting access, election administration, and post-election processes.

Civil liberties and political rights create the space for democratic participation by protecting individual freedoms and ensuring that all citizens can engage meaningfully in political processes. These protections include freedom of speech, assembly, and the press, as well as due process rights and equal protection under the law.

Historical Perspectives on Democratic Challenges

American democracy has faced significant challenges throughout its history, from the Civil War to the Great Depression to various social movements that have tested institutional capacity and popular commitment to democratic principles. Each of these periods has required adaptations and reforms to maintain democratic legitimacy while addressing changing circumstances.

 

The Civil War represented perhaps the greatest existential threat to American democratic institutions, challenging fundamental questions about the nature of the union and the relationship between federal and state authority. The resolution of this conflict through constitutional amendments and reconstruction efforts demonstrated both the resilience of democratic institutions and their capacity for reform.

The Progressive Era brought significant reforms to democratic institutions, including direct election of senators, women’s suffrage, and various measures to increase government accountability and responsiveness. These changes reflected growing demands for more inclusive and effective democratic governance in response to industrialization and social change.

The New Deal period saw substantial expansion of federal government authority and the creation of new institutions designed to address economic challenges and social needs. These developments tested traditional understandings of the proper scope of government while demonstrating the capacity of democratic systems to adapt to new circumstances.

 

The civil rights movement challenged institutional practices that excluded African Americans from full political participation, leading to landmark legislation and constitutional interpretations that expanded democratic inclusion. This period illustrated how social movements can drive institutional change within democratic frameworks.

More recent challenges have included questions about campaign finance, political polarization, media fragmentation, and the role of technology in political processes. Each of these issues raises important questions about how democratic institutions can maintain effectiveness and legitimacy in changing environments.

Contemporary Political Discourse Patterns

Modern American political discourse has become increasingly characterized by polarization, with political actors and citizens sorted into relatively distinct ideological camps that often view political opponents as fundamental threats rather than legitimate competitors. This polarization affects how political institutions function and how citizens engage with democratic processes.

 

Social media and digital communication platforms have transformed how political information spreads and how citizens engage with political issues. These technologies have created new opportunities for political participation while also creating challenges related to misinformation, echo chambers, and the rapid spread of unverified claims.

The role of traditional media institutions has evolved significantly, with declining trust in mainstream journalism among some segments of the population and the proliferation of alternative information sources. These changes affect how citizens receive political information and form opinions about government policies and political leaders.

Political messaging has become increasingly sophisticated, with extensive use of polling, focus groups, and data analytics to craft appeals to specific audience segments. This development has implications for how political leaders communicate with the public and how citizens understand complex policy issues.

The nationalization of political discourse has reduced the role of local issues and relationships in political decision-making, potentially weakening connections between representatives and constituents while increasing the influence of national political narratives.

Institutional Stress Points and Adaptations

Democratic institutions face various forms of stress that test their capacity to maintain legitimacy and effectiveness. Understanding these stress points helps identify areas where reforms or adaptations might be necessary to preserve democratic governance.

Constitutional interpretation disputes can create tensions between different branches of government and different political factions. The Supreme Court’s role in resolving these disputes makes it a focal point for broader political conflicts about the direction of American society and government.

Legislative gridlock can prevent government from addressing pressing policy challenges, potentially undermining public confidence in democratic institutions. The causes of gridlock include partisan polarization, institutional rules that require supermajorities for action, and strategic considerations that may make political leaders reluctant to compromise.

Executive power questions arise periodically as presidents test the boundaries of their authority in response to various challenges. These situations require careful balance between effective governance and respect for constitutional limitations on executive authority.

Electoral integrity concerns can undermine public confidence in democratic processes, particularly when there are disputes about voting procedures, election administration, or the accuracy of results. Maintaining public trust in electoral systems requires ongoing attention to both the reality and perception of fairness.

Interest group influence and campaign finance issues raise questions about whether democratic institutions adequately represent the interests of ordinary citizens or whether they have become dominated by wealthy individuals and organizations with disproportionate political influence.

The Role of Political Leadership

Political leadership plays a crucial role in maintaining the health of democratic institutions through both formal actions and informal modeling of democratic norms. Leaders who respect institutional boundaries and engage constructively with political opponents help reinforce democratic practices, while those who challenge these norms can contribute to institutional erosion.

Presidential leadership carries particular significance because of the visibility and influence of the office. Presidents who demonstrate respect for constitutional limitations, engage constructively with Congress, and maintain civil discourse with political opponents help model appropriate democratic behavior for other political actors and for citizens.

Congressional leadership also affects institutional health through decisions about procedural rules, committee operations, and inter-party cooperation. Leaders who prioritize institutional integrity over short-term political advantages help maintain the effectiveness of legislative processes.

Judicial leadership involves maintaining independence from political pressure while demonstrating respect for constitutional principles and legal precedent. Judges who are perceived as fair and impartial help maintain public confidence in the rule of law.

State and local political leaders play important roles in maintaining democratic practices at the grassroots level, where many citizens have their most direct experiences with government. These leaders can help build public confidence in democratic institutions through effective and accountable governance.

Civil Society and Democratic Participation

Civil society organizations play essential roles in democratic systems by providing venues for citizen engagement, advocating for various policy positions, and serving as intermediaries between citizens and government institutions. The health of civil society affects the overall vitality of democratic governance.

Nonprofit organizations, advocacy groups, and community associations create opportunities for citizens to participate in political processes beyond voting. These organizations help educate citizens about policy issues, mobilize political participation, and provide channels for influencing government decisions.

Professional associations, labor unions, and business organizations represent the interests of various economic groups in political processes. The balance of influence among these different groups affects how well democratic institutions represent diverse economic interests.

Religious institutions often play important roles in political discourse and citizen engagement, though the appropriate relationship between religious organizations and political processes remains a subject of ongoing debate in pluralistic societies.

Educational institutions contribute to democratic governance by providing citizens with knowledge and skills necessary for effective political participation. The quality and accessibility of civic education affects the capacity of citizens to engage meaningfully with democratic processes.

Media organizations serve crucial functions in democratic systems by providing information about government activities, investigating potential abuses of power, and facilitating public debate about policy issues. The independence and credibility of media institutions affects their capacity to fulfill these democratic functions.

Reform Proposals and Future Directions

Various reform proposals have been advanced to address perceived weaknesses in American democratic institutions while preserving their fundamental characteristics. These proposals range from constitutional amendments to procedural changes to new technologies that might enhance democratic participation.

Electoral reforms include proposals for campaign finance changes, redistricting reform, alternative voting methods, and modifications to the Electoral College system. Each of these approaches aims to make electoral systems more representative, competitive, or responsive to citizen preferences.

Legislative reforms focus on procedural rules that might reduce gridlock while maintaining opportunities for minority party input. These proposals include changes to filibuster rules, committee structures, and legislative scheduling that might improve congressional effectiveness.

Executive accountability measures include proposals for enhanced congressional oversight, transparency requirements, and limitations on presidential authority in certain areas. These reforms aim to maintain effective executive leadership while preventing potential abuses of power.

Judicial reforms address concerns about court politicization through proposals for term limits, court expansion, or changes to judicial selection processes. These reforms seek to maintain judicial independence while ensuring appropriate accountability.

Technology applications offer potential opportunities to enhance democratic participation through online voting, digital town halls, and other innovations that might make political engagement more accessible and convenient for citizens.

International Perspectives and Comparisons

Examining how other democratic societies address similar challenges provides valuable context for understanding American experiences and potential reform options. Different democratic systems have evolved various approaches to common problems, offering lessons for institutional design and adaptation.

Parliamentary systems provide different models for organizing executive-legislative relations, potentially offering insights into alternatives to the American separation of powers system. These systems typically feature closer coordination between executive and legislative branches while maintaining democratic accountability.

Proportional representation electoral systems create different incentives for political parties and different patterns of coalition-building than the American first-past-the-post system. These alternatives may offer insights into how electoral rules affect political competition and representation.

Federal systems in other countries provide examples of different approaches to balancing national and subnational authority. These comparisons can inform debates about American federalism and the appropriate distribution of governmental powers.

Constitutional reform processes in other democracies offer examples of how societies can adapt their fundamental governing documents while maintaining democratic legitimacy. These experiences may provide insights into how constitutional change can occur within democratic frameworks.

Conclusion

The ongoing vitality of American democratic institutions depends on the continued commitment of political leaders and citizens to democratic principles and practices. While challenges to democratic governance are not new, each generation must work to maintain and adapt institutional arrangements to meet contemporary needs while preserving fundamental democratic values.

The resilience of democratic institutions ultimately depends on both formal constitutional structures and informal norms that govern political behavior. Maintaining this resilience requires ongoing attention to both institutional design and political culture, ensuring that democratic systems can respond effectively to changing circumstances while maintaining their core commitments to popular sovereignty, individual rights, and accountable government.

Future developments in technology, global politics, and social organization will likely create new challenges and opportunities for democratic governance. Successfully navigating these changes will require thoughtful adaptation of democratic institutions combined with renewed commitment to the principles that make democratic government both possible and desirable.

The health of American democracy depends not only on the actions of political elites but also on the engagement and vigilance of ordinary citizens who must ultimately hold their representatives accountable and participate actively in democratic processes. This shared responsibility for democratic governance represents both the greatest strength and the ongoing challenge of democratic systems.

Pores: We’ve all got these tiny openings in our skin for releasing sweat and oil, but for some people, they can be more temperamental than others. Or, rather, clogged pores happen more often to some of us than others. Clogged pores happen when oil doesn’t or can’t flow through them as it should, explains board-certified dermatologist Geeta Yadav, MD.

“Typically, this is caused by the overproduction of oil that then becomes trapped by dead cells that haven’t properly shed from the lining of the pore. Makeup, dirt, and/or comedogenic ingredients can also block the pore, and prevent that flow of oil through it,” she says.

Comedogenic is essentially a word for pore-clogging, and while these types of ingredients aren’t the sole cause of acne and breakouts—there are several factors—they certainly won’t help the situation. “Pore-clogging ingredients make it much more likely that pimples will form,” says board-certified dermatologist Rachel Nazarian, MD.

“In someone who has naturally oily skin or who harbors the bacteria that causes acne, using these ingredients is like adding gas to the fire. It’s a dangerous combination that can exacerbate acne and cause consistent breakouts.”

 

Celebrating the Life and Legacy of a Remarkable Woman Who Transformed Pain into Purpose

There are moments in a parent’s life that defy the natural order of things, moments that challenge everything we believe about how life should unfold. As I write these words, my heart carries the weight of an impossible contradiction—the profound grief of losing my daughter, paired with an overwhelming sense of pride for the extraordinary woman she became and the legacy she leaves behind.“I brought my daughter into the world, and I was with her as she left it,” I said as I held Deborah’s hand during her final moments. It was a privilege I never wanted, a responsibility that no parent should ever have to bear, and yet, in those last precious hours, I felt honored to be the bridge between her first breath and her last, to provide the same comfort and love that had surrounded her arrival forty years earlier.

A Life Cut Short, A Legacy That Lives On

Deborah passed away at the age of forty after waging a courageous five-and-a-half-year battle against stage 4 bowel cancer. The mixture of sadness and relief that washed over me in those final moments reflected the complex emotions that had defined our family’s journey since her diagnosis—the heartbreak of watching someone so vibrant fight for every day, paired with the peace that comes from knowing her suffering had finally ended.

 

Only High IQ People Can Spot The Parrot

 

information quickly and efficiently. They are also able to think outside the box and see things from different perspectives. These skills are essential for spotting the parrot in this picture, which is well-hidden and camouflaged.

Look carefully at the picture and pay attention to detail. Look for anything that seems out of place or unusual. Squinting your eyes can help to blur out some of the background details and make the parrot stand out more.

Your time starts now! Good luck!

If you were able to spot the hidden parrot within 8 seconds, congratulations! You have a high IQ and are highly intelligent. It is impressive to spot the parrot in the picture because it requires a high level of intelligence, observation, and analytical skills.

A

B

C

ANSWER: 

Hidden Animals Optical Illusions Answers

Did you spot the hidden parrot? If you’re still searching, you’re certainly not alone. Check below for the answer.

 

 

SHARE this optical illusion picture with your family, friends, and colleagues. Challenge them to spot the hidden parrot in this image in 8 seconds or less.

 

In a rare moment of bipartisan cooperation, the United States Senate just took a dramatic step that could reshape the digital economy and redefine how cryptocurrency operates within American borders. The decision, buried among a series of high-stakes votes this week, marks a turning point for both financial regulation and technological innovation. But it also opens the door to new political clashes, deeper ideological debates, and an intensifying battle over the future of money itself.

 

What exactly happened on the Senate floor—and why is it sending shockwaves through the crypto world and beyond?

Let’s break it all down.

A New Chapter for Cryptocurrency: The GENIUS Act Passes the Senate
After months of lobbying, political negotiation, and uncertainty, the U.S. Senate passed the GENIUS Act, a groundbreaking bill aimed at creating the country’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoins—a type of cryptocurrency tied to the U.S. dollar or other traditional assets.

The legislation passed by a 68–30 vote, earning support from several Democrats and the majority of Senate Republicans. It now heads to the Republican-controlled House of Representatives before it can reach President Donald Trump’s desk for final approval.

For the cryptocurrency industry, the moment is being celebrated as a landmark victory.

“It is a major milestone,” said Andrew Olmem, a former deputy director of the National Economic Council under Trump and now a managing partner at Mayer Brown. “It establishes, for the first time, a regulatory regime for stablecoins, a rapidly developing financial product and industry.”

What Are Stablecoins—and Why Do They Matter?
Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar. Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, stablecoins are often used as digital equivalents of cash, allowing traders and users to move funds quickly between platforms or across borders with minimal fluctuation in value.

They are also central to a range of new technologies, including decentralized finance (DeFi) applications and global payment systems.

Supporters say stablecoins could offer:

Faster, low-cost international payments

Digital access to dollars for people in unstable economies

Tools for innovation in fintech and online banking

However, critics have long raised concerns about transparency, regulatory gaps, and the potential for misuse, including in money laundering, terrorist financing, or market manipulation.

What the GENIUS Act Actually Does
The GENIUS Act introduces a detailed regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers, with several key requirements:

Backing by Liquid Assets
All issued stablecoins must be backed 1:1 by liquid reserves—such as U.S. dollars or short-term Treasury bills.

Monthly Disclosures
Issuers must publicly disclose their reserve compositions every month, offering transparency to regulators and users.

Licensing Requirements
Only licensed entities will be permitted to issue stablecoins, helping to limit risks from foreign or anonymous entities.

Audit Standards
Independent audits will be mandatory, ensuring that issuers are not engaging in fractional reserve practices or deceptive reporting.

Federal Oversight
The bill gives the Federal Reserve and other U.S. financial agencies authority to monitor and enforce compliance among stablecoin issuers.

A Billion-Dollar Industry, Now Under Scrutiny
The stablecoin industry has grown at an explosive pace, with popular tokens like Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) reaching hundreds of billions in circulation globally. But with that growth came scrutiny.

Some issuers have been accused of misrepresenting their reserves, while others have operated outside U.S. regulatory reach. At the same time, crypto lobbying in Washington has surged, with companies spending over $119 million to support pro-crypto lawmakers in last year’s elections.

Now, with regulatory clarity on the horizon, major firms are likely to either adapt—or exit the U.S. market entirely.

Political Reactions: Unity… with Undercurrents of Tension
While the bill passed with bipartisan support, not everyone was thrilled with its contents or implications.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a vocal critic of crypto markets, blasted the bill’s perceived loopholes in a fiery floor speech last month:

“A bill that turbocharges the stablecoin market, while facilitating the president’s corruption and undermining national security, financial stability, and consumer protection is worse than no bill at all.”

She and several other Democrats demanded stricter anti-money laundering provisions, along with rules preventing foreign tech companies or non-U.S. entities from issuing private stablecoins in American markets.

Despite this, moderate Democrats joined Republicans in passing the measure, signaling an emerging consensus that the crypto sector can no longer exist in a legal vacuum.

Trump’s Influence and the Road Ahead
President Trump, who once expressed skepticism toward Bitcoin, has taken a pro-crypto pivot in recent years—particularly during his 2024 campaign, where he courted tech innovators and digital asset investors as a new economic constituency.

The White House has expressed urgency in passing the stablecoin bill into law before August 2025, with Bo Hines, Trump’s digital assets adviser, pushing hard for a finalized version of the bill within weeks.

Trump himself is expected to sign the GENIUS Act into law if it clears the House, where GOP support is even stronger than in the Senate.

This shift reflects Trump’s broader attempt to align the U.S. with crypto-friendly jurisdictions and ensure that American capital markets remain globally competitive as digital currencies become more mainstream.

A Busy Week in the Senate: Ambassadors and Alliances
The Senate’s approval of the stablecoin bill wasn’t the only headline this week. In a busy flurry of decisions, the chamber also confirmed three major ambassadorial appointments, all put forward by President Trump.

Each new appointee is a billionaire businessman with longstanding Republican ties:

Warren Stephens – Confirmed as U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland by a 59–39 vote.

Tom Barrack – Confirmed as U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, winning approval with a 60–36 vote.

Tilman Fertitta – Confirmed as U.S. Ambassador to Italy, with an overwhelming 83–14 Senate vote.

All three men are known for their influence in Republican circles and their personal friendships with the president. They are expected to play high-profile roles in trade diplomacy, cultural outreach, and military cooperation over the next few years.

What This Means for the Crypto Industry
With Senate passage of the GENIUS Act and White House backing, the crypto industry now stands on the edge of a new era—one where regulatory legitimacy might finally match technological ambition.

Some potential implications include:

Institutional Adoption: With clear rules, traditional banks and investment firms may become more comfortable adopting stablecoin technology.

Consumer Protection: Transparent reserve requirements and audits could limit the risk of future collapses like the Terra-LUNA crisis.

Innovation Acceleration: Regulatory clarity could unleash new development in payments, lending, smart contracts, and cross-border transactions.

Market Consolidation: Smaller or opaque issuers may be pushed out, leading to a more centralized—but arguably safer—ecosystem.

Yet, critics warn of overreach, surveillance, and the potential stifling of decentralized technologies if regulation becomes too tight or politicized.

The Global Picture: Other Nations Watching Closely
As the United States moves forward, international regulators are paying close attention. Many nations, including the EU, Japan, and Singapore, have already rolled out stablecoin frameworks or are in the process of drafting them.

If the GENIUS Act succeeds, it could become a template for global standards, helping to establish a universal set of best practices around reserves, disclosures, and risk management.

Conversely, failure to enforce strong oversight could inspire regulatory arbitrage, where unstable or unethical issuers simply relocate to less-stringent countries.

Final Thoughts: From Wild West to Wall Street?
The U.S. Senate’s vote on the GENIUS Act marks a seismic moment in financial history. What was once a niche corner of internet culture—stablecoins and crypto assets—has now officially entered the realm of regulated financial infrastructure.

Whether this leads to greater adoption, tighter enforcement, or unexpected consequences will depend on how the bill is implemented—and how the public, the markets, and political leaders respond.

For now, the message is clear: crypto is no longer underground. It’s headed straight for the center of the world economy.

 

Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota sparked controversy after a Democracy Now interview in which she compared U.S. actions under Trump to authoritarian regimes. Drawing on her experience growing up under dictatorship in Somalia, she condemned the use of troops during protests and criticized Trump’s military parade as un-American.

Omar warned that such moves threaten constitutional freedoms and reflect a dangerous shift away from the nation’s founding values. Her comments, she said, were rooted in a desire to protect democracy — even as a refugee who became a U.S. citizen.

The backlash was swift. Critics on social media called her ungrateful and questioned her loyalty, with some suggesting she should leave the country. Conservative voices accused her of incitement and pressed for stronger action against her.

Despite the outrage, Omar stood by her remarks. The incident underscores ongoing tensions over patriotism, dissent, and who gets to define American values.

 

 

I only went to the shelter to drop off old towels—a “small good deed” to lift my spirits after a job rejection and a voicemail from my ex. But walking past the kennels, I stopped. There was no barking, no noise—just silence.

That’s when I saw her: a brown dog with graying fur, sitting still, as if she’d forgotten how to hope. Two handwritten signs on her kennel read:
“Hi! I’m Ginger! I’ve been waiting here 7 years, 9 months, 2 weeks, 2 days. I’m a good girl! I promise! I just need a second chance.”

Seven years. My throat tightened. She didn’t bark or approach, just looked at me like she no longer believed anyone saw her.

A volunteer told me Ginger had been surrendered after her owner died. She’d watched every other dog get adopted. “They nearly stopped putting her up for adoption.”

Still, I sat with her. “For the first time in weeks, the silence didn’t feel lonely.”

Before leaving, I asked her quietly: “What if we both got a second chance?” She pressed her paw to the bars.

I didn’t adopt her then—I wasn’t sure I could handle it. But her eyes haunted me. I went back the next day, just to check.

The shelter manager met me: “Ginger’s not doing well today… She stopped eating yesterday… sometimes, older dogs just give up if they’ve waited too long.”

I’m Dottie, 22, and I’m hard of hearing. My best friend Maya is completely deaf, and we communicate through sign language every chance we get. One day, we were at our favorite café, chatting and laughing as usual, when an entitled mom suddenly demanded we stop signing. She said it was “disruptive” and “inappropriate.”

Maya and I have been friends for seven years, and sign language is our natural way of talking it’s how we connect beyond words. But this woman wasn’t interested in understanding. She told her son to stop copying us and then marched over to tell us our “hand waving” was disturbing her child.

The whole café went quiet. I looked her in the eye and said this was a perfect chance to teach her son about diversity and that sign language is a beautiful, legitimate form of communication. She laughed it off and called us selfish, but before things could get worse, James, our waiter, stepped in. He calmly told the woman she was the one causing a scene and explained that sign language is used by millions of people and deserves respect.

The other customers started clapping, and the woman’s face turned red. Her son, Tyler, then bravely came over, signed “I’m sorry” to us, and asked Maya to teach him how to sign “friend.” James later told me his brother is deaf, which is why he stood up for us. That moment the kindness from strangers and Tyler’s innocent courage reminded me that everyone deserves to be accepted exactly as they are.

Ancient Origins

Birthday cake dates back to ancient Greece, where people made round, honey-sweetened cakes called plakous to honor Artemis, the moon goddess. The round shape “symbolized the moon,” and candles were added to mimic its glow and bring good luck.

The Romans added honey, nuts, and dried fruits to their cakes, keeping the tradition alive. During the Middle Ages, only the wealthy could enjoy spiced birthday cakes flavored with cinnamon and nutmeg because sugar was rare and expensive.

The Modern Birthday Cake

In 18th-century Germany, sweetened bread-like cakes topped with sugar and fruit became popular. This marked “the true beginning of the birthday cake tradition as we know it today.” The Industrial Revolution made ingredients cheaper and baking easier. Baking powder helped cakes become fluffier, and mass-produced candles made birthday celebrations accessible to everyone.

A Symbol of Celebration

Today, birthday cakes come in many flavors and styles but still carry a deep meaning. They represent “joy, blessings, and the sweetness of life.” So, when you blow out your candles, you are “taking part in an ancient tradition that started with moonlight, honey, and a wish for happiness.”

Brittney Griner Steps Away from Basketball: “No one wants me on their team.”

 

WNBA star Brittney Griner announced she’s stepping away from competitive basketball indefinitely. In a message posted to social media, she wrote, “No one wants me on their team,” adding, “I’ve given everything I have to this game, but the noise is louder than the cheers now.”